This week’s reader has been the most difficult material to absorb so far. Perhaps it was because of its incessant references and comparison to other theorists, but it was difficult to follow the points the author was making. Having pointed that out, it seems to me that constructivists sound a lot like the formalists. They put great emphasis on the method of production, and such attitude is exemplified in Vertov’s “The Man with a Movie Camera.” Constructivist’s diligent effort to discover and master their technique is admirable. Evolution of movie film from a mere reproduction of the eye to something much greater is amazing. But all great achievements aside, question remains: is purpose of art to convey a message or to present a technique? Vertov’s work conveys a simple message very clearly through an extensive use of several advance film editing techniques. If the purpose of art is to present a technique, is art just something to be appreciated?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment